Subject	Re: 130 psi is acceptable for a rebuilt engine
Posted by	theo.laz on March 17, 2014 at 3:06 AM
	This message has been viewed 343 times.
In Reply To	130 psi is acceptable for a rebuilt engine posted by Stanky on March 16, 2014 at 10:37 PM
Message	I am sorry Tanley, I did not understand... you mean to say that 130psi is "acceptable" only if the cams also get replaced with some-sort of "special" cams? I am curious to know... note that this rebuild was supposed to be on a normal VGE30TT engine block (i.e. no "modifications").
Follow Ups	the "rebuild-engine blues"... :( - theo.laz 18:57:17 03/16/14 Sounds like you were screwed. - Tanley 20:37:52 03/16/14 Re: Sounds like you were screwed. - theo.laz 21:05:35 03/16/14 174 psi is perfect, but even on newly rebuilt engines - Tanley 21:38:24 03/16/14 Re: 174 psi is perfect, but even on newly rebuilt engines - theo.laz 22:32:26 03/16/14 130 psi is acceptable for a rebuilt engine - Stanky 22:37:35 03/16/14 Re: 130 psi is acceptable for a rebuilt engine - theo.laz 03:06:40 03/17/14 You should do a leak down test. You have stock cams. - fuzzymonkey 17:22:59 03/18/14 I really cringe when I hear about stuff like this!! - BarryGZX 23:25:09 03/16/14 Sorry to hear about your troubles - ZXRider 10:36:04 03/17/14 the lifters might be frozen for those cylinders - Zvil (FL) 13:03:36 03/18/14 Re: the lifters might be frozen for those cylinders - theo.laz 14:28:28 03/18/14 sorry to hear it bub (n/m) - Zvil (FL) 14:57:03 03/18/14 Compression test with no cams will not work - ZXoltan 17:30:20 03/18/14 Re: Compression test with no cams will not work - theo.laz 23:24:04 03/18/14 Re: Re: Compression test with no cams will not work - theo.laz 23:28:55 03/18/14 That range is acceptable for race cams, not for you - ttsmokin 13:42:13 03/19/14 Based on this engine builders reputation I would say - Tanley 12:37:25 03/19/14 leak down test my bad (n/m) - Zvil (FL) 15:40:23 03/19/14
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.